Diabetes and Coronavirus

@Narciso to my company I am not going to tell you how my health is something private that does not care.They should be occupational risk prevention who did the procedures.A companion Her husband is transplanted from the heart her head doctor played a role for the address of Q could not go to work the answer was that not to mention.I work in a public residence.
The other week will call me my header doctor and I will tell him to see what he tells me.
Thanks for the information.

As a disabilities manager I am finding numerous preventive casualties prior certificate issued by the occupational risk prevention society that considers the worker as especially sensitive to the situation, especially in cases where the telebrabus option or difficulties forAdapt the position.

In my case I initially stayed as a localizable retainer, despite my insistence on the option for teleworking, until in the end they agreed.It was of no use to be located to be required by the public health service, where the risk is greater than in my job.

For Drjesusangel, there are several doctors who have advised me to request that Social Security value the degree of disability that I have for diabetes.They tell me that it will come well, not for a pay because it is not much that they usually give you, but for the issue of the income statement and especially for my case as manual manipulator manually in warehouse, IIt serves for the company to adapt the position in others that are automatic

What can you advise me?Thank you

@Narciso is one thing is the permanent disability that can be total permanent disability for the usual profession and that represents an economic benefit of 55% of the regulatory base (or qualified in the case of having an age greater than 55 years and as a consequentlyof 55% plus the additional 20%) and that allows other works that do not imply the same requirement, and another the degree of disability or disability.

The competent agency to declare a permanent disability is the National Institute of Social Security (INSS), while the competent body to declare the degree of disability depends on each Autonomous Community and has as such an autonomous entity, therefore it is not related to theNational Social Security Institute.

In your case, you should request it from the corresponding body to process the disability of your Autonomous Community, and with the pertinent resolution to request the adaptation of the position to the company's prevention society (which is not the same as the mutual collaborator with Social Security).The adaptation can be requested with the clinical documentation that you have at the prevention service without having the degree of disability recognized.If the company has automated positions, I do not see logical that occupational risk prevention standards are not applied.

The degree of disability greater than 33% does entitle deductions in the IRPF.

Anything do not hesitate to ask me.

Thank you so much.All clear and concise.

anaisabel said:
@narcissus to my company I am not going to tell how my health is something private that does not care.They should be occupational risk prevention who did the procedures.A companion Her husband is transplanted from the heart her head doctor played a role for the address of Q could not go to work the answer was that not to mention.I work in a public residence.
The other week will call me my header doctor and I will tell him to see what he tells me.
Thanks for the information.

Prevention services belong to the company, therefore going to them means notifying the company your health status.Another thing is to go to the prevention delegates that represent the workers, but they already tell you that without having the company, they cannot do almost anything.

The fact that the company does not have to know anything about your health status, I understand it, but unless it puts your relationship with it (unfortunately it happens a lot) I do not see that the company knows that you suffer something as important asType 1 diabetes. I reiterate that first of all, I respect your decision not to say anything to the company.More would miss.

We must also distinguish between the company's own prevention service and the occupational risk prevention society.By law it is absolutely forbidden to communicate data related to the state of health, so the prevention society will issue an apt certificate, not suitable or suitable with limitations and what are those limitations, but will not collect health or pathology data.

After knowing several cases of type 1 diabetes with coronavirus and with many years of evolution, almost blindness and many problems due to a bad careful diabetes, I tell you to be overcome.It is a week supero and without respiratory picture.
There are very strong nature with 76 years.

@Cypruscat I don't know if you are at home with telephone care, I guess they will tell you that you have to go to the hospital if you upload the fever ..

This thread is quite long and I have thought about opening another because the video of this link brings scientific information about why type 2 diabeticTruth risk population.
its vision essential

Link

Are you talking about type 2 and type 1?

Of course, that is that, of type 1 says nothing.
I was recently in a videoconference of an epidemiologist and an endocrine and asked if there were studies of type 1 diabetics that had had the infection to see the evolution.They told me that there was not so far, surely because the proportion of type 1 is very small with respect to type 2, so the studies for the moment are of type 2.
It would be good to see the others, because the basic substrate and the etiology of one and the other have nothing to do.

The Ministry of Health has published a guide for people with diabetes, although not much, is limited to a series of indications.

Recommendations that I do not consider a great help.The activity factor is influential in control (dose and food).

From my point of view I see that once again we are unprotected.In Portugal, initiatives have been taken as a telephone support line that works throughout the day attended by specialists, and as some colleagues have told me, it is giving very good result in the control of diabetes for the current situation.

Well, go instructions !!That is what a diabetic should do with Coronavirus and without coronavirus.
And as always if we have a doubt or problem we go to the doctor Q at the moment he will attend us by telephone.

Have you spent any?

Hi, @regina.I suspect but I have no way of knowing for sure, because it was in the last week of January and in the two rapid tests that I have recently performed the result was evidently negative.But come on, that at that height I saw myself completely abandoned by the public health service, and the things I had to listen.

According to my experience, I doubt that if in person then it was difficult for adequate assistance, I do not want to imagine it on the phone.

@Regina, maybe I'm hypochondriaca, but I think so.A month with a horrifying dry cough, but that is normal in me, for rhinitis.Many hypoglycemia that cost a world overcome.
Mild;Loss of appetite sometimes with a little nausea, an episode of diarrhea.
And I have not been with anosmia for two months, if not with "fantosmia".Medical consultation (online) says it can be for rhinitis.
I made a chest plate and no pneumonia.
No test.

@drjesusangel, @solaria, to see if they could do the antibody test, it would be the only way to know
If you had it, at least you have surpassed it well, without hospitalization..The he encourages us all ..

@Egina Unfortunately to the week and a half I ended up hospitalized because I was not able to hold me at home for more serum and intravenous medication, although I only had a digestive clinic.Every time I went to the Emergency of the SES, the diagnosis was a 24 -hour gastroenteritis and that the intravenous medication that was not so much, rest the rest the rest and work.At the house of the blacksmith's blade.

Hello.I change a little subject and advance what could happen.I do not know if you have seen the government's spot on television in which there are advice for the return to the work that occurred a few weeks ago.

I leave link: Link

Well then.It is clearly said that if you are a risk person (includes diabetics), do not go to work, and that can be justified medically.But I wonder: Will it be an impediment to finding a work person?That is, we will be unemployed diabetics because it will not hire us or the tato?Or worse: are we going to be unemployed because the government will prevent us from accessing a job for our health?

They are things that I consider.