Carbon roast meat increases the risk of diabetes: Harvard study

Eating "well cooked" meat and the embers is more harmful than you think.Experts say that the way of cooking the protein of animal origin is directly related to diabetes.

The study published in Diabetes Journal reveals that regardless of the amount consumed of these products, high chicken cooking temperatures and red meat are associated with a greater risk of the disease.

To carry out the research, Harvard University scientists observed for more than a decade a total of 289,000 people, who initially did not have cardiovascular diseases, cancer or diabetes.

"Our research suggests that the risk of diabetes increases not only because of the type and amount of meat consumed, but the way of cooking it," says Gang Liu, a researcher at the Nutrition Department at the Harvard Public Health School.

Meanwhile, the study did not find a direct relationship between fish and the risk of diabetes 2;However, experts warn that a lower amount of data available on the intake of this food could have affected the result.

Although, it is not clear how a greater risk of disease is caused, experts suggest that high cooking temperatures derive from toxic substances such as heterocyclic (AHC) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (HAP) that, in addition to being related toCancer can cause insulin resistance.

As a prevention, Liu highlights the importance of opting for moderate temperature cuisine methods, in addition to replacing red meats with other protein sources, such as white meats and plant foods.

Diabetes prevails as a danger to the health and economy of Mexicans.Nearly 3,872 MDD are invested to attend the disease, and is the second cause of mortality in the country.

This must be taken with tweezers because to start it is an observational study based on questionnaires that are made to a series of people about their habits.And nobody ensures that the data is 100% real.If it costs to remember what you ate yesterday you will remember the last month or year.
In addition, it has been seen relationship of something does not imply that one thing is the cause of the other.The example that is always put for this is that the consumption of ice cream is related to drowning in swimming pools but that does not imply that those who consume more ice cream are more risk of drowning.
Nor are more life data from these people, the same is that those who consume more meat in barbecues also have worse habits in general.The conclusions about a concrete food or way of cooking should only be taken into account in well raised studies with two groups of similar habits in which you change something and see the differences between them.Observational studies of this type only serve to look for possible things to investigate but do not offer conclusions that serve to give health recommendations.