Remove Freestyle 2 sensor before being exhausted

I am also looking forward to me 3. I want to believe that all the failures that have been remedied in the previous devices no longer inherit them on 3.

My daughter never had the reader, only the mobile with the free app and is doing very well, just one sensor failed him early and immediately sent him another
He is waiting for 3, because of his size and because he will not need to pass his mobile, if he also sends continuous data.
They seem better advances to me.

This is @regina, sometimes I don't understand so much complaint, I think the three will facilitate everything, by size and according to someone who uses it, it is better than the dexcon, having, I'm already impatient 😛 🤣 🤣 🤣

Well, for tastes the colors 😀
For me, calibration is important and Abbott does not offer it in its products.It is a great failure compared to other brands.
If I could not calibrate, I stay with the Free reader because it measures almost the same as the capillary, while the FreeLink app is a lucky roulette.Sometimes it approaches and sometimes shoots.

Size matters, of course, but right now I already have a continuous receiver without having to wait for free 3 and that allows me to calibrate measures by adjusting more to my glycemic reality.

Of course, the most important thing is accuracy, but my daughter is very similar to glucometer ,.Let's see the glycosilada if it coincides now ..

Indeed, as Ruth says, for tastes colors.I personally prefer not to have to depend on the mobile but the reality is that we will have no choice.
I trust however, with 3, the mobile is better because I, I can't work with the mobile to control diabetes with the free2.It is also true that I have a range of 70 - 140 for pregnancy and I need maximum precision, that work alarms, etc ...
The funny thing is that I spent the same with the previous mobile, the same constant errors.

Andrespmat said:
so is @regina, sometimes I don't understand so much complaint, I think the three will facilitate everything, by size and according to someone who uses it is better than dexcon, having,I'm already impatient 😛 🤣

Well, the truth is that yes, if people with diabetes had no advances .... then what?

People are not complaining about the advances, they are commenting on the failures that Free3 is having as in their day had them 1 or 2.
There is a thread about the alarms of the free3 in which this is discussed and I think I remember that there is another one about people who, having used the 3, today prefers the 2. There comes this conversation.
However, this is normal and the logical thing is that these advances are improving.

nigiri said:
people are not complaining about the advances, they are commenting on the failures that the free3 is having as in its day had them the 1 or 2.
There is a thread about the alarms of the free3 in which this is discussed and I think I remember that there is another one about people who, having used the 3, today prefers the 2. There comes this conversation.
However, this is normal and the logical thing is that these advances are improving.

Indeed.I bought one to try it and I was surprised that I have some failures that do not have the 2. In my case I wrote a post explaining the pros and cons in my view in case it was interested.
There are also many people who speak for good or worse of 3 and have not even tried it, they talk about hearing.Each one is free to say what they want, but it is always more logical to speak after having experienced it in oneself.