Why has Liraglutida been marketed?

I recommend an interesting blog:

In it I have read this (matizo that the liraglutida only treats type 2 diabetes):

In the last bulletin pharmacotherapy evaluation of the CEMPS, an analysis of the liraglutida (incredin for the treatment of diabetes mellitus) is published in which it is concluded that:
- It does not imply any therapeutic advance, not even for any group of patients with a special characteristic.It is, therefore a me-too, (equal efficiency as others from the same therapeutic group and similar theoretical security although without studies in phase IV)

- Patients have to prick it because it has no oral form

- It is double the face that the most expensive insulin (glargine) and three times more expensive than the insulin NPH.

Incredible.And then they intend to save by closing beds and operating rooms.

This has no arrangement.I am very demoralized seeing how this country continually repeats the same mistakes, whoever is in power.We could now rationalize spending on administration in many millions without cutting benefits or services.But it seems that nobody can think of how.They are lost in nonsense.

Ah, and I don't agree with that health and education should be untouchable in terms of cuts.Saying that is simplistic.It is very progressive but it is childish.Here in this thread we have an example.Of course, we must also rationalize spending in those areas, as in others.In health, thousands of millions and health services are wasteful* are managed by incompetent that do not see beyond the papers that put them on the table.And when they see two roles at their table that refer to an expense, in one it costs 3 and in the other 5, because they go to 3 without thinking anything else.And so it goes.

* Edito to put the asterisk by afraiding that, of course, when I speak of health managers, I mean the regional.Because currently, in health issues, the autonomies are the ones that make each one at will.And it is they who have in their hand make the health budget invested in a rational and adequate way.

This is only useful to confirm the boycott strategy and subsequent privatization of absolutely all public services.It is being tried, from within, sabotage everything that is related to public administration.Its effectiveness and efficiency will be discredited and its waste will be demonstrated, although we will have seen how its managers will have been rewarded to meet the marked objectives.What I put below has been hung on the network for a long time without being modified at all.Every time I listen to new economic or political news in these difficult years they only remember what I already read more than 5 years ago in some places that would be called subversives.

It is written in a global environment.Copy and Pego:

The AGCS (General Agreement on Commerce of Services, or in English GATS - General Agreement on Trade and Services) is a multilateral agreement prepared by the WTO since 1995 under the impulse of the United States, and which concerns the "services" inVery broad sense of the term.

The negotiations have begun in January 2000 and have to last until January 2005, limit and peremptory date set for the adoption of the agreement.The negotiations are directed by Robert Zoelick (see photo) for the United States and Pascal Lamy for the European Union.

In fact, as "Service-Favor", the AGCS foresees the total privatization of the set of public services: the Public Distribution of Electricity (EDF), El Correo, Public Transport (Air France, SNCF, Ratp), but also healthand education whose access will be reserved for the most favored.In the long term, this means a decrease in life expectancy, a massive return to functional illiteracy, of increasingly intelligent and increasingly manipulable populations ....

In the end, the AGCS foresees the total liberalization of 160 sectors of activity, of which some represent fabulous world markets that have long excited the private sector (2000 billion dollars for education, 3500 billion dollars for health).

Before the signing of the AGCS, European governments have begun to put into work the privatization of public services.The privatization projects already announced from some public services in France (EDF, Air France, the post ...) are being dictated by the AGCS, that the right and left governments have secretly developed, behind the backs of the citizens,And with the complicit silence of the media, but also of "collaboration" trade union organizations of the new economic order (the leaders of the first French union, the CFDT, are regular participants of the Davos Forum).Identical policies are currently applied in all Western countries.

As for AMI, AGCS negotiations develop in the greatest opacity.Despite the repeated demands of certain European parliamentarians, access to negotiation documents has been rejected.

Like AMI, AGCS always tends to favor more freedom and rights for multinationals, to reduce the economic power of states, and to methodically dismantle the set of social and environmental regulations.These simultaneous attacks are inscribed in what should be called a war.A social and internal war, a war war against citizens.

Thanks to the apathy of the public and the union counter-union, this war is about to achieve its objectives: the annulment of the set of social rights acquired for 1 century, the suppression of any obstacle to the "freedom" of company (Freedom to contaminate, freedom to exploit without limit, freedom to destroy lives through misery and unemployment ...), and the final suppression of the power of the chosen institutions (the states) andThen, of democracy.

To respond to this war that enters its final phase and whose consequences will be irreversible (without return), time has arrived for citizens.

sabotage before privatization

Economic Policy Notebook "N ° 13 of the OECD