As I explained my presentation message, I am a couple of a diabetic girl for a little over a year, since then my visits to the super lead an incessant reading of products composition labels.Among all the things that has caught my attention, the one that is the most the world of sweeteners;My partner consumes an interesting amount of dusting saccharin thinking that it was just saccharin.I hung on my blog photos and a brief explanations of the observed, as I suppose I would be ugly that I was a link from my own blog, I will reproduce part of what I exposed in it:
As we can see, in the labeling they indicate that it contains dextrose, which is nothing but a form of glucose.If we turn the sending and observe the nutritional information we find:
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.
Yes ... Mebhabia reported ... in this type of products.As its sweetening power is very large, hydrates are barely appreciable in ascent (important to take into account)
I am now in process with health to defeat the regulatory of food products.(Diabetic products) where they put fructose as a suitable sweetener (it is flipant !!! With this regulation, companies can label for diabetics when they are not. I will inform you of the whole process
No signature configured, update it from user's profile.
anna said: yes ... already mebhabia given ... in this type of products.As its sweetening power is very large, hydrates are barely appreciable in ascent (important to take into account)
I am now in process with health to defeat the regulatory of food products.(Diabetic products) where they put fructose as a suitable sweetener (it is flipant !!! With this regulation, companies can label for diabetics when they are not. I will inform you of the whole process
It seems absolutely great, I am with you that the Food Products Law is a real mess, both in the products "suitable for diabetic" and for everything else.
It goes without saying that if I can be useful in some way here you have me for anything,
